Saturday, December 12, 2009

GOVERNOR CHARLIE CRIST


CHARLIE CRIST ON PUBLIC CORRUPTION

Dear Ms. Stonebraker:

Thank you for contacting Governor Charlie Crist. The Governor appreciates your concerns and asked me to respond on his behalf.

The Florida Constitution limits the Governor's intervention in matters that should be resolved through the court system. Judicial misconduct is handled by the Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC). The commission considers situations where it is alleged that a judge's personal conduct and behavior violated the Code of Judicial Conduct. All complaints must be put in writing. The commission's address is 1110
Thomasville Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32303. If you need to ask preliminary questions, the telephone number is 850-488-1581. Unless the judge has violated the Code of Judicial Conduct, the commission cannot review cases where people disagree with judges' decisions.

Those who are unhappy with a ruling or feel a case has not been handled according to the law, should speak with an attorney about what appellate procedures may be available. The Florida Bar offers a Lawyer Referral Service. They can be contacted by calling toll-free at (800) 342-8011, or by writing to 651 East Jefferson Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2300. For those unable to afford a lawyer, Florida Legal Services or the county legal aid association has information about the availability of pro bono counsel. The main telephone number of Florida Legal Services is (850) 385-7900. If you are dissatisfied with your representative, I encourage you to consider choosing another attorney.

Public corruption involves a breach of public trust and or abuse of position by federal, state, or local officials and their private sector accomplices. By broad definition, a government official, may violate federal law when he or she asks, demands, solicits, accepts, or agrees to receive anything of value in return for being influenced in the
performance of their official duties. Report of public corruption can be submitted to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) through their public corruption web page at
http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/pubcorrupt/pubcorrupt.htm or at the address
below

Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
Phone: 1.202.324.3000

You may also wish to view answers to frequently asked questions about public corruption at http://www.fbi.gov/page2/june05/obrien062005.htm

Thank you again for contacting the Governor's office. We are sorry we could not be of more assistance. Please know this is due to a lack of jurisdiction, not a lack of concern.

Sincerely,

Warren DavisOffice of Citizen Services

4 comments:

  1. LIP SERVICE IN THIS CASE OF PROVEN LEE COUNTY LIES AND PUBLIC CORRUPTION:

    "UNHAPPY" ABOUT PUBLIC CORRUPTION IS A POLITICIAN'S WAY OF CONCEALING GOVERNMENTAL CORRUPTION AND LOOKING THE OTHER WAY.

    ReplyDelete
  2. CHARLIE CRIST DOES NOT GET IT:
    MS. STONEBRAKER HAS BEEN BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON GOVERNMENTAL CRIMES. TELLING HER TO REPEAT THAT WHICH SHE SAID UTTERLY FAILED IS PLAIN AND SHORT IGNORANT AND OF NO SERVICE TO ANYONE.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Sirs:

    I am going to respond to this "response" of Charlie Christ, although ironically, is not the governor that was in office when I was abused, as it was Lawton Chiles. I am going to demand some answers as to why, I was so denied, when there is a case (your case) that has proved that there is corruption in Lee County, proving that the "possibility" of fraud and corruption CAN exist and DOES exist in Lee County.

    I have boxes full of paper work, court documents, letters, copies of letters, certified registered mail receipts of letters that were sent out, copies of letters I wrote, pictures, videos, newspaper articles ..... I kept everything.

    I have videos of where the news was trying to expose the fraud....one in particular that a newsperson sent to me in confidence, telling me that it was against the media code to send people tapes, but she felt that they were violating my rights and she filmed this for me. It shows me going into the State Attorney's office after my so called "Motion for a New Trial" where I went from there, right to the state attorney's office in D’Alessandro's office in the courthouse making a complaint at the front desk that they violated my rights again. The news reporter followed me into the state attorney's office.

    Through all of this I made national news in four major papers, front page headline news. Boston Globe, Boston Herald, New York Times, and the Atlanta Constitution. All the articles were about the abuse that was being done to us. In the beginning one of the articles stated that I was abused in Arbitration Detention. This was ignored. I was a "whistle blower" from the beginning and severe government retaliation followed, using us as an example of what could happen to others if they don't cooperate. Setting a very bad example for my children of what government abuse can do. It was just as they told us...."we better cooperate with them" You are not allowed to rebuke them.....even if they are committing a crime. You are supposed to do as they say and keep very quiet about it. They punish you. I never asked for this.....they put me in this quagmire....

    ReplyDelete
  4. … I am going to be sending out what you have sent to me so far to other eminent domain victims as they all should be on the lookout for similar crimes...that may be very hidden. I have been a form of a spokesperson for many others going through this, for years, showing people what to look out for in eminent domain. I will be sending what you sent to me to the Atlantic Yards taking in Brooklyn New York, Everyone should be aware. I have also sent out what you sent to me, to my friend in New Jersey, Clara Halper, who has been violently abused by the government.along with her children, where government retaliation has been so bad that the police have arrested her poor husband for breathing wrong. Horrendous. New Jersey is very high in corruption.

    My husband feels that if there is going to be eminent domain, it all should be under Federal jurisdiction because the way they have it now, it is an every "Tom, Dick and Harry' law....every city hall has their own rules. No consistency and not governed very well. There should not be eminent domain at all, except maybe in DIRE emergencies, where there is no other way around the situation and certainly not to benefit another.

    The ironic thing is, I emailed Steven Anderson of the Institute of Justice and asked him...."where in the law does it give people protection from being thrown out of their houses, into the street, and where does it give us protection against intimidation, harassment, bullying, threats, abuse and even terrorism. He told me that it was all under the "reformed" laws under "each state". Well, I started doing my research... no where in the law are we protected from this. These so called "reformed' laws only "skim the very surface". No where in the law or ANY law does it exercise the "right' to use abuse, harassment, threats, intimidation, bullying or even terrorism.....unless in resisting arrest and even at this, there are limitations.

    Sincerely, Angela Stonebraker

    ReplyDelete